tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2005756131065514338.post1756843987406785522..comments2024-03-27T15:49:28.147+00:00Comments on Commonwealth Stamps Opinion: 1029. πΈπ¨π«π― New Seychelles And Fiji Stamps; Birds To Appear on 2019
Europa Stamps.White Knighthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17968199477827266643noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2005756131065514338.post-83633134169768921072017-09-26T13:12:47.948+00:002017-09-26T13:12:47.948+00:00You have provided information about stamps, they a...You have provided information about stamps, they are really very valuable. And people are very useful to read such information.<br />Thank you so much for this<br /><br /><a href="http://pincodezone.com/" rel="nofollow"> Pincodezone </a>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15760399294673298874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2005756131065514338.post-42219682182344385012017-06-30T06:30:45.156+00:002017-06-30T06:30:45.156+00:00Thank you again Chris. You are of course quite rig...Thank you again Chris. You are of course quite right about the inclusion of a higher value in Fiji new sets and that this seems to be becoming a habit. <br />You make an interesting point about the vacant catalogue number and the St. Kitts issue.White Knighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17968199477827266643noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2005756131065514338.post-61604407416484059872017-06-30T05:18:14.969+00:002017-06-30T05:18:14.969+00:00I agree that the value of the stamp is less than t...I agree that the value of the stamp is less than the limit mooted by the Catalogue Editors, but the reality is that when they issue one with every issue (so six or more a year), isn't that just as bad as a post office that issues one very high value stamp once? I also notice that the SG catalogue editors themselves are being cautious with the high value in the St Kitts issue not being listed, but a catalogue number being left vacant (just in case perhaps?).Chris de Haerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01103852699388056651noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2005756131065514338.post-66593741947575742162017-06-29T04:38:10.975+00:002017-06-29T04:38:10.975+00:00Dear Chris, Thank you. An interesting thought but ...Dear Chris, Thank you. An interesting thought but I suppose that, though highish, the face value doesn't approach the Β£10 level which the editor mooted as his broad upper limit of acceptability for inclusion in the Catalogue. That, coupled with Fiji being a 'respectable' stamp issuer (as you put it) and certainly in terms of number of stamps issued per year it is an accurate description by modern-day standards - I guess will insure that the $15 should find a place in the catalogue. No doubt we will find out in the fullness of time.<br />Best wishes.White Knighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17968199477827266643noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2005756131065514338.post-52473729746391306472017-06-28T20:47:26.678+00:002017-06-28T20:47:26.678+00:00I wonder what the SG catalogue editors will do wit...I wonder what the SG catalogue editors will do with the $15 Fiji Reef stamp considering it clocks in at a tad over Β£5. Granted this isn't nearly as excessive as the other high value stamps issued by other countries, but Fiji now regularly includes a $10 (or other high value) stamp in every commemorative issue. Or will SG list these as Fiji is a 'respectable' stamp issuer?Chris de Haerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01103852699388056651noreply@blogger.com